The Nobel Prize Committee's decision to award Robert Edwards, the Cambridge University biologist who developed In Vitro Fertilization, was generally appauded by most of the scientific community and Louise Brown, the world's first "test tube" baby, born in 1978. Shockingly, most of the news reports ignored the darker consequences of IVF and other reproductive techologies that have led to the freezing of an estimated 500,000 embryos and destruction of countless others deemed genetically defective. Here's my report in the National Catholic Register, which also notes that IVF procedures only have a 30 percent success rate--thirty years after Louise Brown was born. Alternative methods of addressing infertility--such as treating the underlying medical conditions that created the problem in the first place--are addressed by Dr. Hilgers at the Pope Paul VI Institute in Omaha, Nebraska. States Dr. Hilgers:
Dr. Thomas Hilgers, director of the Omaha-based Pope Paul VI Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction and developer of pro-life NaPro Technology, believes it is past time for physicians dealing with infertility to re-evaluate their tendency to promote IVF. Instead, he argues, they should treat the medical conditions that lead to infertility.
“IVF is a technology that destroys life to create life. It does not look for or address the underlying causes of infertility. On both counts, it’s the wrong approach and a lot of people have suffered as a result,” said Hilgers, an obstetrician, gynecologist and specialist in reproductive medicine and surgery.
More than three decades after Louise Brown’s birth on the 10th anniversary of Humanae Vitae, notes Hilgers, IVF procedures have yet to exceed a 30% success rate for achieving pregnancy. Still, women are encouraged to pay tens of thousands of dollars for several cycles of treatment and undergo invasive medical procedures.
The brutal truth, said Hilgers, becomes clear in this “mind-blowing statistic”: There are “9.5 million women in the U.S with reproductive problems, and, in a given year, 99.5% of those women will never have a baby using IVF.” For many women, the legacy of their gamble with IVF is “mistrust and regret.”
The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
The third in the new series of Narnia films, The Voyage of the Dawn Treaderd is decent family fare but offers a slightly different spin from the book's author, C.S. Lewis. -- at least that's my argument here, in my column for Headline Bistro. Below is the thrust of my critique:
"You and I have need of the strongest spell that can be found to wake us from the evil enchantment of worldliness," C.S. Lewis, the bestselling Christian apologist, author and academic, once observed. And in his series of fantasy novels for children, The Chronicles of Narnia, this bestselling author of adult spiritual classics helped generations of young readers to awake from “the evil enchantment” before they were mired in its thrall.
A spellbinding Christian allegory disguised as a series of adventure stories, The Chronicles of Narnia are embedded with deep spiritual and moral insights that fly below the radar of the reader’s skeptical, self-protective reflexes. For some fans, the seven-book series constitute the author’s greatest legacy. Could we offer similar praise for the film versions of these beloved books, with the most recent – “The Voyage of the Dawn Treader” – released in movie theaters last week? The short answer is: not likely.
Setting aside the second Narnia film -- the ghastly “Prince Caspian” – both the first adaptation, “Narnia: The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe,” and the new “Dawn Treader,” offer acceptable family fare. But these cinematic makeovers aren’t ambitious enough to stand up to “evil enchantment.” If spiritual warfare is required, then these limited productions provide insufficient firepower.
Posted at 09:37 PM in film review/commentary | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)